Simple, systematic trading strategies that work

Every strategy on EdgeLab is tested on data it has never seen before it gets published — full rules, honest backtests and the code to run them. The rules are plain English, simple enough to run on any platform or code in any language. Most strategies fail our tests. These didn't.

Download the free strategy Read the research

Three years of backtested strategy equity, 32 trades, 78% winners, net of costs
The free strategy — three years, every trade, net of costs

Latest research

All research →

Download the free strategy

A simple RSI-based strategy with a handful of clear rules. Over the past three years it has taken 32 trades — 25 winners (78%) — with a worst drawdown of -8.2%, net of costs. It's in the market about 8% of the time: one alert does the watching, your capital sits safe between signals, and the markets get minutes of your day instead of owning it.

Backtest equity curve over three years: 32 trades, 78% winners, steadily rising, net of costs
Three years, every trade taken, net of costs. The flat stretches are the strategy safely in cash between signals.

The free report gives you the market, the timeframe and the exact rules — in plain English, they fit on a sticky note — plus every single trade with timestamps, 23 years of long-run evidence for the idea, and the honest caveats. Nothing held back, nothing to buy first.

How we test

Every strategy published on EdgeLab has passed the same three filters:

  1. Out-of-sample validation. The most recent 20–30% of price history is locked away during development and used exactly once. If the strategy fails there, it's rejected.
  2. Sensitivity analysis. Every parameter is shifted ±20–30%. If the edge only exists at one magic setting, it's curve fitting — rejected.
  3. Monte Carlo simulation. Trade order is randomized across thousands of runs to stress-test drawdowns beyond what the historical sequence happened to produce.

And every backtest pays its way: we charge 0.05% per side in commission and slippage — roughly two to three times what a liquid ETF actually costs to trade at a decent broker. If an edge can't survive costs it will never pay in real life, so we'd rather understate every number on this site than flatter one.

More than 80% of the strategies we develop are rejected. Here's why that rejection rate is the whole point →

Who's behind this

I'm Robin Eriksson. I spent my first five years in the markets losing money on discretionary trading before switching to systematic strategies — and testing everything. EdgeLab is where I publish the research: what works, what doesn't, and the process for telling the difference. More about me and the methodology →